October 02, 2003
Telepresence culture
Matt Webb has a great series of posts exploring presence and the way people interact in virtual environments.
I think we've found that virtual reality isn't necessary for presence, only that the behaviour of something that appears to be "human" is transmitted through the behaviour of the medium.We're at an interesting stage, where lots of communications technology is becoming "socially invisible" - mobile phones and WiFi-enabled computers are everywhere, taken for granted. There's a two-way movement of models and ideas between the real and virtual environment.
Two people standing in a park, waiting for a call. The phone rings. Guy ('tis his mobile) answers; Gal, although obviously keen to become a part of that virtual place, has to stand and wait for the call to be done. A three-way online chat can happen fluidly and quickly - but real-world telephone "conference setup" is wickedly complicated... why?
vcard
| January 2005 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
archives:
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
see also:
{groove:
[ ray,
matt,
paresh,
mike,
jeff,
john ],
other:
[ /* more blogroll to follow */ ]
}
The views expressed on this weblog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
RSS 2.0
RSS 1.0
